Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that video records are a better method to learn how other people in the world live rather than by written documents. From my point of view, I quite disagree with this statement.
It goes without saying that video records are helpful due to their vividness and realisticness. When learning by video records, they provide moving pictures and sounds which make people easier to imagine and experience the way other people live. In addition, studying by video records help people understand deeply about the color of other people’s life and the atmosphere around them. For instance, it becomes impossible to imagine the details of other people's life in written documents while it just has black letters and white paper and no colorful picture.
However, there are two reasons for my disagreement. First, written documents are usually written by professors due to their specialized information. This type of document often be written by professional ones and it also be censored strictly before being published to make sure that all the information is correct. This action helps people understand more and more about the way other people live by verified and detailed documents. Second, while reading written documents, people need to use many skills to analyze the information. There is much information included in written documents so that people have to use reading comprehension skills to understand what they are given and this is not as easy as video records which people just need to watch. They can gain knowledge, from that their IQ can improve.
In conclusion, the value of video records is the one we can not deny but written documents are also a good way because of its wide range of information about other people’s life in the world. The important thing is that everyone has to find one way that suit themselves and their preference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 78
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding atmosphere'?
Suggestion: the surrounding atmosphere
...ut the color of other people’s life and the atmosphere around them. For instance, it becomes impossible to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ritten by professional ones and it also be censored strictly before being publishe...
^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed and detailed documents. Second, while reading written documents, people need t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03883495146 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65117882747 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8814438776 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414461718342 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133127555712 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114310940795 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275463896398 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046502035522 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.