Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many people argue that video recordings are more useful than reading written about other people's lives in the world. In my opinion, I partly agree with this statement and will discuss my view below.
On the one hand, video recordings can provide more engagement with the way people live in the world. They can show the views and sounds of different cultures, allowing viewers to experience them in a way that documents cannot. People can understand more about this and it is an excellent way for children to get to know about other cultures in the world. Additionally, videos can capture communication and behavior difficult to illustrate in writing, more detailed about how people live. If, for example, they see a clip about how dirty water is used in Africa's households, their minds will be permanently etched.
On the other hand, written documents can provide more details about the way people live in the world. The author is able to communicate complex ideas and concepts clearly and precisely through the writing and reading of documents. For illustration, when reading, the reader is immersed into the author's perspective and can feel their emotions. Moreover, written documents also give readers a historical context that may be missed from video records. By reading, people can gain more information and the broader context of the cultures they are learning about. The feelings of people in other cultures cannot be explained by video recordings, and only written documents can do it.
In conclusion, both video recordings and written documents have their strengths and limitations when learning about other people's lives. The most appropriate approach may be to use both forms to gain more understanding of different cultures and ways of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- Schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...eading, the reader is immersed into the authors perspective and can feel their emotions...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15277777778 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67673879106 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524305555556 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.4858551698 49.4020404114 29% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373004456044 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142583648308 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115281987817 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249136779708 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117136185835 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.