Watching a live performance such as a play, concert, or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is supposed by people that it would be an exhilarating experience when they could watch events such as a play, a concert, or a sporting event in the performing locations. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this point of view.
To begin with, there are some reasons why watching these live events would be more captivating. Firstly, due to being experienced and visualized on their own, people could entertain themselves thanks to the authenticity of the performance. By contrast, if people just view a programme via the Internet or television, people could not immerse themselves in a vibrant and appealing atmosphere in a stadium or a theatre. Moreover, watching a live performance allows audiences to capture valuable moments such as a football player scores a golden goal or a ubiquitous singer holds hand fans at the right time. This also affects audiences’ spirit when they are not affected by unwanted and extrinsic elements such as Internet interruption or transmission error when watching on the television.
On the other hand, some people might say that it would be tired and exhausted when these watchers have to mingle with a hectic stream of people in these public places. However, because of this minor difficulty, the value of these live performances could be enhanced when other watchers show an ardent desire to watch these events. Furthermore, some could also complain that a distant seat compared to the stage might hinder them to see every gripping detail. But, in reality, these seats even allow audiences to have a broad view which a close seat does not meet this demand.
In conclusion, although viewing a live performance could bring about some minor factors, I advocate the importance of being seen the whole picture of these events from the beginning to the end and the interesting atmosphere of a live football match or a music festival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | dinhngocquynh2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that outdoor activities bring beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03205128205 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81134874896 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4057930155 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223094083366 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090757454681 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906774729689 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166211726737 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103342929625 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.