When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
I agree that when there are technological skill developments in a country, then the country’s way of life would likely change and traditional skills might die out. Even though in the past people cared about their tradition and wanted to keep it alive, I do not think it is a big deal to save the tradition anymore.
When technology develops it impacts people’s lifestyles since thanks to technology, robots or some devices can do most of the activity that they used to do in their normal life by hand in the past. Additionally, it affects the lifestyle which plays a big role in tradition. The other thing that has an effect on people’s lifestyles is that people see how other people live in other countries. More specifically what they are up to or what they do on a daily basis, which causes them to envy others.
I personally do not think envying others' lifestyles and putting your own tradition in the background is a bad thing. Because not all traditions are logical and ethical. For instance, there are some traditional things that put women in an unimportant position or make them look weak. So, I think due to technology people now can search things up to learn about it in more detail and understand the tradition whether they like it. When they have the knowledge, it makes them question some of the daily things or traditional actions that they are taking. And some societies need technology to have knowledge about their traditional actions and their meanings, so they can decide on their lifestyles and personalities since technology has a great impact on people's decisions and personalities.
In conclusion, once the person’s lifestyle has changed that means it cannot be the same as the past when it was all about their tradition. Basically from my point of view, people need to let some traditions go and stop trying to keep it alive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-13 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | Henry14 | 11 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 61
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 78
- In some societies stress is now regarded as a major problem and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past However others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated They say that the previous generatio 56
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and the comparisons whe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e the knowledge, it makes them question some of the daily things or traditional actions tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82554517134 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77209908573 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7800865719 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251232112624 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903980009147 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107328894066 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17215478213 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121878910888 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.