When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of conflicts between tradition and technology and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas some people believe that traditional skills will be eventually extinct by the advent of technology, others are of the opinion that officials should attempt to keep traditional ways of life alongside technology alive. In my mind, humans are capable of preventing traditional skills’ extinction due to technological developments.
Obviously, conventional skills and crafts have the ability to maintain their importance accompanying with technology. Japan could be taken into account as a tangible example. Japan, as one of the most sophisticated nations in terms of technology, succeeded to combine technology with tradition. Populace of Japan come up with innovative approaches to prevent mass extinction of their traditions, albeit nations around the four corners of the globe consider Japan as a symbol of modernization.
What’s more, technological feats stem from creative ideas, but apparently simple, of traditional skills and craftsmen. Hence, it is more likely that mankind couldn’t reach such cutting-edge technologies without utilizing conventional skills as well as masterpieces of our ancestors. Thus, traditional skills pave the way to colossal improvements regarding technology and so we shouldn’t lose sight of values of keeping our traditions alive.
On the other hand, loads of individuals elucidate that tradition belongs to the past rather that the present, or even future. Humans should leave such skills as making artefacts by clay or carpet-producing skills to museums. In their view, technologies will be far more than enough to meet humans’ needs.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that struggling to keep our traditional skills as well as out conventional ways of life alive is inextricably bound up with our fate. By the way, like Shakespeare’s, tradition or technology, that’s the question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | maryyrle | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Amnusheenh | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
- University tuition fees are increasing Some argue that higher education should be made free To what extend do you agree 77
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 47
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 85
- You need to study climate change Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas some p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ruggling to keep our traditional skills as well as out conventional ways of life alive is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as, by the way, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7003257329 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30240794055 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618892508143 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2000868055 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260873127242 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836711895286 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573242521924 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142331834631 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655705423097 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.