When a country develop its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Today is called as the era of technology. In this respect, out-dated skills and methods are disappearing and people are not willing to keep them ongoing with any support. From my perspective, skills and methods in the past should be preserved.
To begin with, it is pointed that traditional life style does not need to be conserved as technology has been developed in countries. First and foremost, a lot more convenient life styles with high-technology are demanded. Considering the fact that hundreds of people are required to achieve their goals in the work place and are expected to complete the performance to the best level, people request modern life skills such as a smart phone wih maps and face-call function. This, as a result, implies that we do not need to go back to the past. In addition, considerable amounts of national budget will be demanded. With the fact that the governments would pour massive sums into preservation of traditional methods, this leads to a lack of budget for new fields linked to science and environments.
Nevertheless, there are two prime reasons why traditional ways of life should remain in our daily life. Firstly, the destruction of history cannot be avoided. This is because tradition inherits culture and unique identities of each country in the world. Secondly, the speed of improving technology could be slow down. In other words, we can acquire a lot more knowledge from the way our ancestors lived and this in turn makes it easier to figure out what we need these days by helping technology grow fast and preserving skills existed in the past.
In conclusion, although there are thoughts that traditional life style does not need to be survived by gaining comfort ways, I believe that leaving them in our society with new technology is more concerned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | maryyrle | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Amnusheenh | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that the increasing gap between rich and poor people has a negative impact on society What are the reasons for rising inequality and what problems could it cause 47
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- When a country develop its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and1995 and Austrailia s share of the Japanese tourists market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at least 1 78
- Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught in secondary school Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... methods in the past should be preserved To begin with it is pointed that traditi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...s linked to science and environments Nevertheless there are two prime reasons why traditi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87128712871 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68255324018 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561056105611 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 303.0 20.2975951904 1493% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1476.0 106.682146367 1384% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 303.0 20.7667163134 1459% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 135.0 7.06120827912 1912% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26201046416 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.26201046416 0.084324248473 311% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159570210697 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154863596772 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 153.0 13.0946893788 1168% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -227.61 50.2224549098 -453% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 120.3 11.3001002004 1065% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.45 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.47 8.58950901804 262% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 123.2 10.1190380762 1218% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.