When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Over the past decades, there have been a vast number of machinery breakthroughs. It is widely believed that it is meaningless to (remain) preserve conventional lifestyles or skills. I strongly disagree with this point of view, as I suppose that they always bring particular values in our life.
On the one hand, automation brings positive impacts in various aspects in daily life. In fact, there have been more and more innovative machines in many fields such as science, education, or daily domestic activities which are extremely useful and convenient. In terms of domestic chores, for example, many families in big cities, parents often buy labor-saving devices like vacuum cleaners, washing machines, or dishwashers, instead of wasting a long time to do that, so they are able to control their time more flexibly to do necessary or pleasant things like reading books or cooking. Plenty of evidence suggests that automation has affected positively to our life so much.
On the other hand, traditional ways or skills demonstrates cultural values. These values are customs, festival, or traditional jobs, which are (transmitted) passed from generation to generation. For instance, in many village areas in Viet Nam, the locals have produced conical hats, which are an important component of traditional wear for women, offered for sale to tourists. Therefore, it is tremendously significant to preserve traditions alive, by this way we are distributing a small part of our country.
In conclusion, although it could be denied that machinery has had beneficial effects, I personally believe that it is necessary to maintain and preserve such old traditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | maryyrle | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Amnusheenh | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in some land 89
- Adult youths are often called up for working for the development of communities Some people say that they should work voluntarily whereas others say that they should get paid Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The table below gives information on consume spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The chart shows the consumption of sales of coffee in five different cities 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33969465649 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96234600483 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652671755725 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9993361896 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.583333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106996739009 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398332553102 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043781374025 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550873257057 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385424312726 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.