When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the
building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Many people believe that the crucial factor, when constructing a building, is function outweigh outside architecture. In my opinion, I think that the purpose of building should follow its outward appearance so I totally disagree which that believe.
The intended purpose of building, of course, is very important. When the houses are built by any places, its function are always the top priority. In aesthetics perspective, the shaggy wall of opera houses, for examples, always make us feel disgusting. But it is built to resonance the singer voices and sort out the unwanted noises. Besides that, we also see lots of skyscrapers, in the modern world, around of large cities. Although these housing-high rise apartments are ugly, but they are the only solution to supply accommodation for millions people.
In term of beauty in construction, the role of outward appearance should not be ignored by any means. When the life of modern people are more and more prosperous nowadays, they tend to find more about the meanings of out's architecture of building which they are living. Landmark 81, for examples, is the building which locates at centre of Ho Chi Minh city of Vietnam. Its outside appearance based on bamboo's images which represent for the images and nature of Vietnamese people. Other building is Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, Marina hotel and casino is the iconic about economic and cultural of this state country. It was constructed in special way that three buildings stand together and the ship shape' swimming pool was placed above of these buildings.
In conclusion, the intended use of the building should go along with its outside architecture.
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010 49
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than inthe past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 67
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 759, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol was placed above of these buildings. In conclusion, the intended use of the b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13970588235 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75968528809 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3131568274 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104736088214 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036907601823 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429843202325 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811742932533 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382470644525 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.