When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To a certain extent, I believe that the most essential consideration in building design is how it will be used, not how it looks. However, I think that the way it was designed also has an impact on people's interest to decide which one they should visit.
There are two main reasons why architects should focus more on its intended purpose rather than its look if they are planning to create a structure. One reason is that the building's construction and usage will affect the community who are currently living around it. The noise when it is being built is one of the factors that cause people's sleepless nights, as a result, they wake up late in the morning or are tired of trying to keep up with their daily schedules. Furthermore, it is harmful to the environment and even public health as a whole. Firstly, construction projects emit large amounts of carbon dioxide and methane while infrastructure developments cause pollution and produce waste, therefore, as the output of the construction industry multiplies, it contributes to global warming in the long run. Secondly, with those detrimental contaminations, people's health can be greatly affected which causes some serious illnesses such as lung cancer, stroke and other respiratory diseases. These consequences will continue to increase if buildings are not designed with eco-friendly systems like life cycle assessment, energy and water efficiency, etc.
Apart from the practical disadvantages of emphasizing the sculpture's use, I would argue that builders should pay a bit more attention to its outward appearance. High-rise buildings are ubiquitous in some big, well-known cities, and it plays an important role in attracting foreign tourists who want to explore its unique beauty, to come and see it. The returns are significantly impressive since it not only improve the locals' standard of living by creating employment in services like accommodation, transport, entertainment but also boosts the nation's economy through investments from multi-national companies. Moreover, outstanding designs can help individuals learn to understand and feel the sense of beauty surrounding them.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, while its function is an important factor, I believe that the exterior of a building should receive the same attention as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-05 | Afdalah Harris | 78 | view |
2022-07-17 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
2022-01-14 | camille1104 | 70 | view |
2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 56 | view |
2021-08-17 | dinhthu05 | 89 | view |
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 69
- environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows information regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 100
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
- The maps show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ate a structure. One reason is that the buildings construction and usage will affect the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...port, entertainment but also boosts the nations economy through investments from multi-...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32520325203 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04384424237 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3203225848 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.357142857 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2142857143 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222824729465 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652964698947 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555595917309 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127399330174 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00734577751863 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.