Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain prfessions because of their gender?
Men and women have their own strengths and weaknesses. Some kinds of work are suitable with men, but women cannot do these well. And some are better to be done by women than men. But it does not mean that we should separate some particular work by gender.
Excluding males or females from some particular jobs can cause gender inequality in the workplace. In the past, people usually considered women cannot become leaders. They were regarded as weakness and had to be under men’s leadership. Gradually, women were insecure in performing their ability of leading. But in fact, there are many women who hold important positions in companies. Furthermore, many politicians of many countries are women, such as: Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel, fashion designer Pierre Cardin …
By the way, many men are very good at doing in some kinds of job that are considered to belong to women, such as: chef, fashion designer, make-up artists … In the past, many people critisized them as weakness. This made many men shy to perform their gifted abilities. But nowadays, the old thoughts no longer exist. Many men have become famous chefs and make-up artists, such as: chef Gordon Ramsay, chef Martin Yan, make-up artist Hung Van Ngo …
In conclusion, although men and women have different strengths and weaknesses, all of them still have mutual hobbies that depend on their strengths not their gender. Classifying certain professions by gender can kill men and women’s strengths and lead to gender inequality.
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 56
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain prfessions because of their gender? 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, still, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12048192771 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5593139514 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 90.9398769764 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0714285714 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326562058825 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117678873628 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105681797024 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219039036546 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119042432257 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.