Write about the following topic.
Write at least 250 words.
In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is said that paying a small number of people significantly high salaries could benefit the country, whereas some people believe it is better for the government to restrict the salaries to a certain level. In my opinion, although both ideas have advantages, letting some people earn high salaries could be beneficial to both themselves and their country.
People having freedom to earn the money as high as possible merit the country. First, they might have to spend more money on taxes of the government. As a result, the country could have a certain source of money to construct more public facilities for the citizens to use, giving them a better quality of public constructions. Second, high-salary employees tend to contribute more on the country's markets. Having extremely high salaries, they, who have higher living standards than the average, might support more products on the market and play an important role in increasing the sales of the country.
However, the governments are said to have to allow salaries under a certain amount. Firstly, this might reduce the discrimination rate between the rich and the poor. As rich people get richer, and poor ones are poorer, this problem could lead to social disorder. Secondly, the government has less burdens on the amount of money they have to pay for the citizens. Rather than paying more for a small number of people, restricting the amount of money for employees to a right level could help them use those money on other necessary fields.
In conclusion, although reducing the amount of money to a certain level could be beneficial, people should have freedom in having salaries as a paid-off for their hard-work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- People should look after their health for personal benefits rather than a duty for a society To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Education levels by age rage 2010 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 56
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
It is said that paying a small number of people significantly high salaries coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun burdens is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... disorder. Secondly, the government has less burdens on the amount of money they hav...
^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...e citizens. Rather than paying more for a small number of people, restricting the amount of money...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...es to a right level could help them use those money on other necessary fields. In conclusi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02150537634 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64371846304 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9247955139 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236713727104 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096449236486 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743753121144 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160421689851 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694712494488 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.