Compare the advantages and disadvantages of Smart phones
All around the world, mobile phones are increasingly present in our lives. Those electronic devices connected to other devices or other networks are nowadays a crucial communication tool for work, leisure, studies and many aspects of our existence. If the emergence of smartphones has eased interconnected communications is some ways, it has also brought many changes in our way to communicate with others as well as in our relation with this device itself. Both the benefits and the drawbacks will be discussed hereafter.
The advantages of using a smartphone for communication are obvious: first of all, with on only gadget, one can easily have access to the telephone network, the internet, the social media, his favorite music and pictures. That means that it can advantageously replace a telephone, a DVD player, a GPS and even a computer for most of user’s level tasks, without the need for several devices. Secondly, all these applications and functionalities fit in a small portable device that can be carried in a handbag or a pocket. As a consequence, that high portability enables its user to execute diverse works pretty much everywhere without having to be at home or at the office. Finally the performances and the prices of the smartphones are improving every day, making these high-technology gadgets affordable for everyone.
On the other hand, as mobile phones are omnipresent in our lives, they have strongly altered the way of socializing. When users are connected on their handset, they are disconnected from their surrounding environment, forgetting to communicate with the ones who are around them and impacting face to face dialogue. It is not infrequent in a restaurant to see all the guests around a table focusing on their smartphones without speaking with the others. Additionally, the central role of cellular phones for all sort of daily applications has led to some addictions, as some people cannot stand the idea of living even a few minutes without their smartphone.
In conclusion, there are many pros and cons associated to the use of a mobile phone. However, in my opinion, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as this is a very efficient tool for modern communication; nonetheless one has to be wary of not overusing it in order not to jeopardize face to face relationships and not to give too much importance to a simple tool.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | Annavo_1208 | 68 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | ielts_tony | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | kani21 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | ehsanmajd | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | ehsanmajd | 73 | view |
- Teaching children and young people how to behave is the responsibility of parents not schools or government To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 67
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of co education 60
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 67
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of Smart phones 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... having to be at home or at the office. Finally the performances and the prices of the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, sort of, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09160305344 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11230360176 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557251908397 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5568822406 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.4 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0639569640138 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254778541987 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328474894221 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377139134931 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00836889974435 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.