Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Indubitably, due to the availability of similar goods worldwide, nations are looking alike. In my opinion, it is a constructive as well as a destructive trend which I will discuss in detail.
On the one hand, buying the same products anywhere around the world holds a wide range of constructive benefits. To commence, with the advent of technological advancements, people can buy the same kind of product by shopping from the internet through e-commercial platforms. In addition to this, online shopping has given consumers an enormous amount of options which offers to select the product of their interest which generally are not available in stores. Finally, customers can buy the same items globally since it is easy to import and export goods using the convenient and fastest mode of transports such as air travel. As a result, it has developed healthy relationships among nations which counts as a positive development.
On the other hand, it has myriad detrimental effects on today's society. Chiefly, countries all over the world are selling surplus goods to other nations these days. Subsequently, this is a tremendous increase in the carbon footprint. Another reason to disapprove of this kind of continuous trend is the loss of cultural diversity. In recent times, it is quite possible to transport clothes from one country to another at a nominal cost. Thus, the popularity of traditional clothes is decreasing as people are adapting the western fashion wear. This has resulted in a negative influence on our cultural aspects.
To recapitulate, although the easy accessibility of the same products all over the world has been beneficial to modern society, it certainly also has adverse effects on development such as negative impacts on local culture and the atmosphere. Therefore, people should choose wisely in shopping the essentials goods as much as possible since this trend will not be finished permanently.
- Television has changed the quality of life for an ordinary person Do you agree or disagree 61
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter Explain why you would like the job Give details of why you would 78
- Your office building does not have parking available Write a letter to the manager In your letter explain the problem suggest a solution say why parking would benefit all employees 78
- You have found an interesting website Write a letter to your friend to tell about the website In your letter you should describe what the website is explain why the website is interesting and tell how this website will help him her 84
- You have lost something on a bus and called customer service to get help You weren t happy with their response Write a letter to the bus company manager In your letter you should describe the item you lost explain why you weren t happy with the customer s 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...nd it has myriad detrimental effects on todays society Chiefly countries all over the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, look, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12621359223 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87916054837 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 309.0 20.2975951904 1522% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1584.0 106.682146367 1485% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 309.0 20.7667163134 1488% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 136.0 7.06120827912 1926% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227422203382 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227422203382 0.084324248473 270% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117040552506 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630418124394 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 157.2 13.0946893788 1200% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -250.62 50.2224549098 -499% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 125.0 11.3001002004 1106% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.66 8.58950901804 275% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 125.6 10.1190380762 1241% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 10.7795591182 529% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.