With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations What solutions can you suggest to deal with this

Essay topics:

With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with this problem?

In modern days, criminals are targeting the kids through the social media that only have limited guidance from the parents. This problem becomes one of the popular global issue that many people are looking for solutions. In this essays, two of the solutions, developer approach and parent approach, are explained.

Firstly, the social media developers should take responsibility to protect the kids from being targeted. One of the solution is to announce and limit the age of the people that can use social media. For instance, the biggest social media, Facebook, recently updated the policy not allowing to access children under the age of 10. Furthermore, it created a new software called Messenger for Kids which allows parents to keep in touch with their children without interfering with the strangers.

Secondly, a more serious approach that has been used by parents is restricting the usage of modern technology including social media until the children have developed the analysing skill. There are some drawbacks behind this approach. The children who are not allowed to use modern technology, might be outdated and unfamiliar with the topics that have been discussed in the school society. However, most parents accepted that limiting from modern technology is the best way to prevent kids from putting in dangerous situations.

To conclude, there are difference approaches to protect the youngsters and all people will require to discuss and work together to find solution for this problem with minimum consequences on the potential and childhood experience of the kids.

Votes
Average: 5.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-18 pththom02@gmail.com 78 view
2020-10-19 ZeeKhan 73 view
2020-04-11 tarakrindani 78 view
2020-01-06 hamza.ijaz980@gmail.com 61 view
2020-01-06 Ayesha dar 81 view
Essays by user Snoob :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ny people are looking for solutions. In this essays, two of the solutions, developer...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accessing
...ecently updated the policy not allowing to access children under the age of 10. Furthermo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'discussing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: discussing
... youngsters and all people will require to discuss and work together to find solution for ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34661354582 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65684781948 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3600012381 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224354454412 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763085278553 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510359972427 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127718717719 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715117265785 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.