A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree?
Ensuring the safety of citizens is the primary responsibility of any government. Therefore, many people assert that the government has to allocate more money on safety as compared to community welfare. In my opinion, although it is required to enforce protection laws for the citizenry, investment on social benefits is also crucial.
Public safety and peace has a paramount importance in any nation. In other words, due to global aggression and fights, the lives and properties of many innocent people are affected. If there are no defense laws and associations in the country for safety, the general public has to suffer. Take the Border Security Force of India, for instance, soldiers have been deployed at the various borders of a country and get regular training for any future-related war with the opponent nation. This ensures that there will be no political harm to the state as well as people, which, thereby, assuring peace and protection.
However, government aid is necessary for society-welfare programs. In the developing countries, a significant amount of people are dependent on subsidies, provided by the ministry. To be more specific, the underprivileged people of the nation are depending on government funds, for their necessary commodities such as food, health, and education. Not only this, for the development, the expenditure of the state’s money on infrastructure and employment is vital. According to the article published in The Guardian revealed that in India, the government has allocated about fifty crores of rupees on education and health schemes in the past two years. Hence, the spending of money on societal welfare by the administration cannot be ignored.
In conclusion, while I agree that the state government has to invest some money in defense and security for its individuals, yet the need for investment in social welfare programs cannot be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-30 | Joel James | 91 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | Emjay | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | bhatvishal@ | 87 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | NAVNEET BALI | 81 | view |
- Write a letter to your friend on a family function In your letter write What is the function What you plan Why it is necessary for her to attend the function 64
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree 67
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday When you got home you realized that you had left your wallet there Write a letter to your friend In your letter thanks to the friend for the holiday explain that you left your wallet in their house give 73
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children while others think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe that it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ciations in the country for safety, the general public has to suffer. Take the Border Security...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he underprivileged people of the nation are depending on government funds, for their necessar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33887043189 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07722985906 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7402490504 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194043549891 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622303652214 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501853794207 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124769810431 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545155746197 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.