The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
These people claim that the government should finance only for public services regardless of thinking about funding in music, arts, and theatre. Personally, I agree that the government should focus on the public sector, though investment in cultural sectors is important as it plays a vital role in our society.
The main reason to provide financial support to public services is that the government gets money from citizens in a form of taxes. Individuals and businesses are paying taxes to the government so they can provide good services to the general public in different ways. Public transportation, health care services are the few sectors government should focus more. Developing countries, for instance, providing better social services to their citizen compare to those countries which are still developing. Despite public sectors, the government should also fund other sectors along with it.
There are two undeniable benefits behind investment in arts, music and theatre. Firstly, the fund from the government could conserve our ancient culture and take it forward to our next generation so they would come to know about the country's cultural background. Moreover, tourism is the second benefit to the host country. Spending money on traditional arts, music and dramas along with promotion at the national and international level would attract people to attend exhibitions and concerts, which as consequences make the country's economy better. The government could get money back if invested in these sectors.
In conclusion, public sectors are an indispensable part of our society and highly focused by the government, however, investment in arts, music, and theatre would conserve our tradition as well as make money through exhibitions and concerts. I agree that the government not solely fund only the public sectors, but also focus on culture-related services.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
- Write about an environmental problem and suggest solutions 11
- You recently took a long vacation In your absence a friend did you a huge favor Write a letter thanking your friend Explain what the favor was Describe how this favor helped you Offer compensation 78
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Scientists have been warning for many years to protect the environment we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to protect 78
- Some people think that having a set of retirement age eg 65 years for everybody regardless of occupations is unfair They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an early age Do you agree or disagree Which types of workers d 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...o they can provide good services to the general public in different ways. Public transportatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...ation, health care services are the few sectors government should focus more. Developin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47766323024 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81599132787 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549828178694 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3115070304 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353142199579 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134257793365 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075061802586 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230617318747 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439888256681 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.