The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Only investing governmental funds in public services and overlooking the construction of cultural production is not advocated for urban management. For instance, in America, the consumption of cultural production like music, library and cartoon can occupy 18 to 25 percent of the total GDP. The government's investment in arts, music and theatre will not only bring giant social advantages, but also promote individual growth for the public.
From the social perspective, the cultural facilities like galleries, opera houses and museums can boost huge economic benefits, which are not inferior to the amount that public services can provide. With the financial support from the government, numbers of movie producers and record companies are building their exclusive brands, which can improve their popularity and boost the influence of domestic culture.
From the individual perspective, such investment to artistic facilities can offer an excellent environment for the exhausted people to take a break and relax themselves, which makes great contributions to the healthy mind state of the public. The soaring number of these artistic places presents a correct direction that the government is attaching more importance to the improvement of public aesthetic appreciation, which is vital for the society's far and long development. Besides, for the young kids that are getting education, the aesthetic teaching is also essential for children's comprehensive development, which means the investment for these fields is absolutely necessary.
Nowadays, people are paying more attention to the spiritual enjoyment than living materials. The investment for arts is as meaningful as it for the basic public services. The government should take the responsibility to provide more cultural productions to satisfy people's demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... 18 to 25 percent of the total GDP. The governments investment in arts, music and theatre w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...eans the investment for these fields is absolutely necessary. Nowadays, people are paying more at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, look, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74907749077 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03630174387 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586715867159 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5290884538 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191030110176 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802385803844 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059550771493 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117410032099 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542312687495 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.