hh
Dear Sir,
I am writing this letter to inform you about some wrong information which was published in one of the articles in this month's magazine. I found it unethical as it imposes different meanings of the word related to the history of the town.
I would like you to correct the spell of some words so that it conveys the clear meaning of artifacts. As our town had ancient fort memories, this kind of mistakes is not only hurt local's feeling but also it creates a horrendous image on dwellers.
you must aware that your magazine is one of the reputational sources trusted by thousands of people, therefore, if they find any unidentical information regarding their culture, they will take it seriously and resulted in unwanted riots.
I will be grateful if you make an apology note for this mistake and also place the article again with the correct words. It will be a pleasure to us and our community.
I hope you will make it possible as soon as possible.
Yours faithfully,
Saumil shah
In this recent times, some individuals consider that having peers with the same mindset is extremely beneficial for future growth, whereas others think opposite and prefer to have distinct nature friends. While some would argue that having similar thinking people help to motivate us in critical conditions, I believe that making different mentality Keiths assist us to develop our knowledge and skills.
On the one hand, human mentality always favors their ideas and feel jolly only when they find the same kind of person in tough situations. This can be exemplified by the fact that introverted nature individuals when they find themselves in unfavorable positions, they directly rush towards the community that has the same thinking so that they could give them a sense of relaxation. For example, In the majority of mental hospitals, patients who have the same thinking, are kept together so that they can share their thoughts. However, this remedy does not help them to develop their brainpower.
On the other hand, the majority of people who are optimistic, give more priority to utilize their time to develop themselves by encountering human beings of distinct thoughts. This is because with this benefit they can make their growth in a positive manner and it could help them to build a strong career. For instance, successful people around the world gives more value to other commodities who have opposite mindset so that they can interact and construct their mind strongly to overcome any horrendous situation that might be occurred in the future. I believe that this school of thought is more superior because it not only encourages but also gives a chance to know new things.
In conclusion, although people having the same mindset protect them in tough times, they have to change their attitude and try to contact as much as new people with other mindsets to sustain their growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-06 | jovanpreet99 | view | |
| 2021-01-21 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2017-10-25 | 9104054 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'months'' or 'month's'?
Suggestion: months'; month's
...ublished in one of the articles in this months magazine. I found it unethical as it im...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... related to the history of the town. I would like you to correct the spell of ...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: You
...ates a horrendous image on dwellers. you must aware that your magazine is one of...
^^^
Line 23, column 238, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...this benefit they can make their growth in a positive manner and it could help them to build a stron...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 76.0 24.0651302605 316% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99180327869 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56092125153 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514344262295 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 749.7 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 5.43587174349 313% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.371951932 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.210526316 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6842105263 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.