The increased world demand for oil in gas has made it necessary for locating these resources in remote and untouched natural areas. Do you think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging these nature areas?
It is irrefutable that the world is demanding a larger amount of energy resources like gas and oil nowadays. As a result, this phenomenon has caused one to damage the remained and unexplored locations of these elements. It has both pros and cons. Personally, I believe that the advantages of this practice outweigh clearly the disadvantages as the benefits more productive for society.
Proponents of such extractions in the natural resources cite a host of benefits. Firstly, this process of derivating different energy sources brings more chances of development of that particular site. Obviously, it will attract national and international refinery firms to work there. As a result, the local public would get employment and they will contribute to a nation's economy. Dahej, Bharuch, for instance, is a great example, which was mainly non-agriculture land, and today, it is one of the productive areas of India.
Furthermore, a nation might not have to be dependent on others, which involves heavy import duties. The revenues generated from such sites may be used to find alternative fuels, which are quite costly and time-consuming processes.
On the other hand, human unsatisfiable needs often have caused detrimental negative effects on nature. Definitely, nature loses its diversity through humans’ intervention. Who are not aware of current happenings in Alaska and Antarctica? In addition, improper ways of extraction have affected these sources very badly. Spills of crude oil under the sea have vanished many sea species. As a result, the whole eco-system is disturbed.
To sum up, I reiterate that human have been looking a different location of resources for the centuries, and it has made possible for a man to land on a moon. However, such practices are very crucial w
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | mayurn.patel20@gmail.com | 79 | view |
- It has been suggested that everyone in the world wants to own a tv a car and a fridge Do you think the advantages of such development outweigh the disadvantages 69
- Many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications. Do you agree or disagree that good social skills are as important as good qualifications to succeed in a job? 78
- many people buy new phones or laptops to keep up with the latest technology. Is it a good or bad thing? 73
- Many people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? How to solve the problem? 78
- Children are taught to push themselves to try and be better than their classmates rather than work together for everyone s profit Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefits more productive for society. Proponents of such extractions in the na...
^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...mployment and they will contribute to a nations economy. Dahej, Bharuch, for instance, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one of the productive areas of India. Furthermore, a nation might not have to ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... costly and time-consuming processes. On the other hand, human unsatisfiable n...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, the whole eco-system is disturbed. To sum up, I reiterate that human have b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32517482517 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04187163289 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8734157297 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1578947368 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212910384029 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480150589713 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597117981007 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106560144547 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859643507887 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.