Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you thing might be effective?
The ever growing traffic and pollution issues ought to be addressed without any further delay, however, I am against of the opinion that the surge in petrol price will reduce these problems. Besides, it will culminate to a development disaster. Everyone aware that the petroleum products act as a backbone to any country's economy.
To begin, the traffic and pollution concerns possess a serious issue in the developing countries. This should be addressed by considering various factors, but not just looking at one action item which is increasing the petrol prices. Moreover, the idea of hiking the fuel cost will further weaken the economy of the country and leads to several serious issues. For example, the basic food produce will foresee an increase in their retail price due to the increase of logistics expenses, which is directly related to fuel consumption. Hence, the government should call-off this idea immediately as there are excellent alternative solutions available to address the traffic and pollution issues.
In order to reduce traffic congestion, the government should invest in building new bridges and wider roads, which will provide the necessary space for the vehicles for commuting. The lesser the travelling time, lower the smoke emission thus reduces the pollution.
On the other hand, the government should emphasize the people on implanting new trees around their locality. Additionally, each corporate companies should plant atleast 1000 samplings every year to compensate the pollution created from their businesses.
To conclude, the idea of increasing the fuel price will culminate in adverse effect to the country. Instead, the government should look out for other alternatives like expanding the infrastructure of roads and plant new trees in the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-26 | JOHN JEYARAJ | 11 | view |
| 2018-10-14 | Rina Arora | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-14 | Rina Arora | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-11 | Basheer Ahmed | 61 | view |
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today's life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that dangerous sport should be banned. Do you agree of disagree? 56
- It is sometimes said that people should be encouraged to get married before they are 30, as this is best both for the individual and for society?Do you agree or disagree? 56
- In last 20 years, there have been significant developments in the field of information technology. For example, the world wide web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative impacts than positive in futu 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you thing might be effective? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, moreover, so, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45878136201 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75462428178 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1000809018 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124836474152 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418441736361 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426435178879 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666816738356 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036657597582 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.