With internet improvements, people can leave views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is it a good or a bad thing. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

With internet improvements, people can leave views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is it a good or a bad thing. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

With the development of science and technology, more people prefer to purchase online without going out to market, sometimes the message under the products is the only source for them to know about what they are buying. It is very convenience for buyers to leave message and send advice to sellers on the net. It is debatable whether it is good or not to leave opinion on certain goods or services. In my opinion, I think it is beneficial only if people leave message positivel and honestly.

On the one hand, a real views on goods and services help buyers to evaluate their products. Manufactories and producers can enhance their quality of goods based on customers' judgement. On one aspect, this is beneficial for public to have a good selling market. On another aspect, producers and merchants have to be honest when they do business as well in order to receive good views. A true evaluation can give reference to other purchasers to compare goods from different sources and channels.

On the other hand, too much and useless judgements or message may confuse buyers. It is said that web violence are full of the whole internet. Some immature and irresponsible dishonest customers eave bad messages so that to release their unbalance psychology or they just could not give a rational or fair suggestion. What is more, it is also said that nowadays some sellers pay for a good view or opinion so that to boost their sales. However, this would definitely not last long.

In conclusion, only with a good supervision, can the information left by customers be beneficial and useful to the sales and the potential purchaser. Both the sellers and buyers can improve efficiencies if there is a good recycle of communication through the leaving message and views.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 cocosasia 73 view
2019-09-06 rer1 67 view
Essays by user cocosasia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leave message positivel and honestly. On the one hand, a real views on goods a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...enhance their quality of goods based on customers judgement. On one aspect, this is benef...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nternet. Some immature and irresponsible dishonest customers eave bad messages so...
^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...e immature and irresponsible dishonest customers eave bad messages so that to release th...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, honestly, however, if, may, so, well, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73145260499 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6797668691 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343369490513 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103963052892 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764066152425 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189801200343 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364148905958 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.