It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports of music and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on training students becoming good sports person or musicians irrespective of the talent they have. On my point of view, students can be trained to become musicians and sportsman if only they have an inborn talent for them.
First and foremost, we will look into the factors that would create a sportsman. A student needs to practice on regular basis to improve their performance in relevant field. For example, students who engage in sports or aesthetic subjects have to attend practices before attending to school and some occasions they have to continue their practices in the evening cutting off their study time. They need immense commitment towards their goals and sometimes sacrifice their leisure time and relationships too. In addition, these people have to take good care on their health to deliver better performances as well.
On the other hand, some parents persuade their students to become musicians and sports personals because of the fame and the income they could earn in their adult life. Nevertheless, there is little possibility of making them sporting or entertainment professional without an inborn talent in them. Unlike the academic studies these skills cannot be improved with constant practice. However, parents should first identify the talents of their children before trying to realize their dreams from their children.
In conclusion, governments can include sporting activities and aesthetic subjects to the national curriculum in order to find out the hidden talents of the students. Once they have been identified, they can be directed on special training under qualified trainers to improve their performances. It is also believed, that governments should regulate sports academies and aesthetic institutions because in modern market context we can see lot of poor quality educations operate in the market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | harmankaur | 91 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | harmankaur | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Kushi | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- How do you think the crime would reduce – with harsher punishments or moral teachings? Discuss both the views and take a stand? 60
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 11
- Technology allows us to have a useful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 95
- In today s era TV has become very important part of life as a medium to spread intelligence and social awareness Do you think it could have other side as well 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ople on training students becoming good sports person or musicians irrespective of the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ality educations operate in the market.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41806020067 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73084244792 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2234194144 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180612633208 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648165396282 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533949355325 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120536984222 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514294418277 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.