It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past few years, the trend of reading books is decline due to the advent of television. Although some people assert it is a negative development, this essay, however, believe people can learn the language thoroughly and understand concepts into detail with watching TV than reading for fun.
Firstly, with the television one can listen to the plethora of new words with its appropriate pronunciation. While I concede that the reading of the book is independent of place and time, as we can start reading anywhere it does not require a power supply. But the problem is it can be monotonous and daunting since it does not involve any video aids. As a result, we can sometimes narrate the story in an erroneous way which can lead to misinterpretation of the information. For an instance, people can adopt the improper method of articulating words. Perhaps it can be rectified when we listen to the video and see subtitles of the track. Thus, watching TV is dominant over reading anything.
Further, to create perceptions, it is the easiest way to watch TV because in reading any books, people have to think hypothetical with building concepts for it. Many supporters of reading books for contentment claims that reading imparts better cognitive skills to the individual. This essay argues reading like an old method of learning as only video aids like watching TV or seeing any videos helps to perceive critical concepts in the 3D pattern which stimulates the brain to be more innovative. Moreover, reading gives only a 2D representation of the story, thus it is not sufficient for wide illustrations.
To conclude, not only reading books is less effective but also a retire method of learning. Therefore, although I acknowledge reading is utterly convenient, this essay strong disagrees that it provides better imagination and language understanding than watching television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-28 | parabshreyas | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | appu161 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | appu161 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | Ronald88 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | rekharastogi | 66 | view |
- Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase the tax on petrol (gasoline). Would advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people feel that courses can make anyone a teacher, while others feel an excellent teacher cannot be made by pursuing a course. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Some people believe all the wild animals should protect while others think only some animal need to be saved Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Many young people regularly change jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this ?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 78
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an erroneous way" with adverb for "erroneous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ult, we can sometimes narrate the story in an erroneous way which can lead to misinterpretation of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'book'.
Suggestion: book
...epts for it. Many supporters of reading books for contentment claims that reading imp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ative. Moreover, reading gives only a 2D representation of the story, thus it is ...
^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eading books is less effective but also a retire method of learning. Therefore, although...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12621359223 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97616059126 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550161812298 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1124230068 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207325138258 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741610895377 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699168737586 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144675169457 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052937233579 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.