It is widely held belief that learning in home schools is better for the holistic development of children than learning in schools

Essay topics:

It is widely held belief that learning in home schools is better for the holistic development of children than learning in schools

It is widely held belief that learning in home schools is better for the holistic development of children than learning in schools.Although,many may see it as a positive phenomenon but this is not a trend without drawbacks. Both the merits and demerits will be discussed in the following paragraphs.

The first and foremost disadvantage is lack of conducive environment at home. Children learn about teamwork which would be substantially beneficial for the their future. Sense of competition would be encouraged in school rather that at home. A recent survey carried out by an eminent psychologist Mr. Robert Wadra at University of Stanford revealed that the children who have educated from home have 30% less brain power than the school goers.

The second disadvantage is the breach of discipline at home. Schools teach children about the time management and also the way of being regulated,which they have missed at home schools. Moreover, children indulge in extracurricular activities organised by the schools which can not be feasible at home.

On the other hand, study at home has also a positive aspect. The first advantage is flexible timings to study. Children can study whenever they want according to their convenience. Besides this, it will reduce the financial burden on the parents because nowadays schools are charging mammoth amount of fees.

After analysing both the views, I am of the opinion that children should go to school for their overall well-being.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-02 Ramanpreet kaur Hans 56 view
Essays by user Ramanpreet kaur Hans :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he holistic development of children than learning in schools.Although,many may se...
^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...t of children than learning in schools.Although,many may see it as a positive phenomeno...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...ldren than learning in schools.Although,many may see it as a positive phenomenon but...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...dren than learning in schools.Although,many may see it as a positive phenomenon but thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...h would be substantially beneficial for the their future. Sense of competition would be e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...ment and also the way of being regulated,which they have missed at home schools. Moreo...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, may, moreover, second, so, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27426160338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04042329825 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603375527426 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6442171891 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415819341853 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1231029405 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148726638826 0.0667982634062 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229368907991 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152455931025 0.056905535591 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.