In many countries, more money is spent on transport system in the cities. In contrast, very little is spent in rural areas. What are the effects of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
These days, governments are spending a lot of money on transport networks across metropolitan areas as opposed to the country-side. This essay will discuss the effects of such a policy and propose some solutions to tackle this issue.
The principle effect of such a policy will be on the economic development of the country-side. We all know that proper infrastructure facilities are a pre-requisite to attract new businesses to any place. With the lack of transport facilities in the country-side, it would be unlikely for rural dwellers to attract new businesses which will eventually create a disparity in the economic growth of rural and urban areas. In addition, tourism industry might also get affected. This is because, usually most of the sight-seeing is present at the country-side. For example, in Pakistan tourists prefer to visit northern areas which fall under the category of rural areas.
The solution to this problem includes the proper allocation of budget between rural and urban areas. Governments must not ignore the development of country-side and must consider the necessity of better transport facilities in the rural areas. In addition, tourism industry must also make efforts to bring governments attention to this issue and highlight the importance of better infrastructure facilities at appropriate forums.
To recapitulate, the disparity between money spent on transport networks in rural and urban areas is likely to cease the economic development of the country-side and is likely to have detrimental effect on the tourism industry as well. In order, to solve this issue governments should consider proper allocation of financial resources between urban and sub-urban area and tourism industry must also make efforts by addressing the issues to the relevant authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-23 | am155 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | Ramandeep Dhillon | 84 | view |
- People doing dangerous sports like bungee jumping and scuba diving should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their live people Do you agree or disagree 67
- There is increase of noise in our daily lives nowadays. Why is this a problem? What can be done to reduce it? 73
- Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the Internet or books. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives. What are the reasons for that? How to encourage people to take an interest towards environment protection? 73
- Today it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 5, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...me solutions to tackle this issue. The principle effect of such a policy will be on the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45714285714 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09392921044 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1184795846 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.538461538 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184818468903 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710983299297 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468752175708 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123166220619 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118651198319 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.