In many countries, as people are earning more these days, they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

In many countries, as people are earning more these days, they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

There has been a drastic change observed in people buying behavior and tendency as compared to the past decade. Nowadays, as the earning capacity increases, people tend to purchase more products instead of saving money. I consider this a positive development, I shall discuss my stance in more detail with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
Predominantly, more buying means more purchasing power resulting into stronger economy. This trend will certainly give strength to country’s economy, as more people will spend money means more money circulating in the market. This phenomenon will attract international brands to invest in that country in which people are inclined to spend what they earned. Thus, people spending their earnings will definitely be beneficial for country’s financial position. For example China is more inclined to invest in India, as they have incremental revenue stats from that region.
To elucidate it further, as people are eager to spend money on buying different products, this will enhance living standards of masses. By replacing the conventional products to innovative items people can bring phenomenal change in their life style. Spending more money in buying quality and efficient products provide them the opportunity to uplift their life style. For instance, if someone purchases vacuum cleaner and replace it with conventional broom, it will not only clean better but will also bring efficiency in work.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, I completely encourage the idea of spending the earned amount as it is not only beneficial for an individual but for the country as a whole. In the future, Government should encourage people to spend money on purchasing instead of saving in bank accounts for no good reason.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-10 GiglyPaf65 73 view
2019-07-25 gk 78 view
2019-02-13 ShahnumZ 61 view
2018-09-13 gilpin2010 84 view
2018-09-12 gilpin2010 56 view
Essays by user ShahnumZ :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42652329749 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89409156464 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8089894559 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311026566862 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116244635279 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719275761371 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18546272346 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774955656413 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.