In many countries, as people are earning more these days, they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In this century, money control everything from daily living from medicine and politics. In other words you can not live a decent life without them.
Unfortunatly, money's value decrease considerably, as people are earning more. To put in another way, people spend more money in buying items, sometimes unuseful. However, the factor who causes this controversial issue about money it's undoubbtely the society. This system have change our mentality and conception about who we should live life. For instance people are buying the most expensive clothes, the newest electronic devices, the fastest car for looking good in other's eye.
My conception about this topic on the following, is that money can not buy happiness. To give you an ilustration, technology is in an uncontrolable developing in other order something new it is out everyday and people can keep the pace with it. Your precious items will get old or broke over the years, my advice is to do not put too much interest in them.
Sincerly, for me spending money on buying more and more items with no porpouse it's a waste and a negative developement. Moreover, to give you a solution for this issue, instead of buying stuff that you don't need you can travel and see diffrenet cultures, meeting new people or trying various type of food, not to mention about different activities which can make you enjoy the life more than before like scuba diving or climbing. This world is huge and can not wait to be explored.
Secondly, talking about the economy and the environement, not living a luxury life sometimes can help the planet. For example instead of driving you can take the bus or can travel by bike, in this way you will reduce the poluation causes by car and you will do sport; in other words you will kill two birds with one stone. Furthermore, buying from your small local shop instead of going to large shopping center, will help the economy and will encourage it.
Above all, money are a luxury and no many people know how to juggle with them, you have to be humble and if you have too much sometimes it's good to share with somebody. Remember that at the end of your days will remain just the memories.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-10 | GiglyPaf65 | 73 | view |
2019-07-25 | gk | 78 | view |
2019-02-13 | ShahnumZ | 61 | view |
2018-09-13 | gilpin2010 | 84 | view |
2018-09-12 | gilpin2010 | 56 | view |
- A person’s health is their own responsibility rather than the government’s responsibility.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people think that mobile phones are most useful for their professional life other thinks that mobile phones are most useful in their personal life. Discuss of them and give your opinion. 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
- Some parents think that childcare centres provide the best services for children of pre-school age. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... in other order something new it is out everyday and people can keep the pace with it. Y...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 80, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ng more and more items with no porpouse its a waste and a negative developement. Mo...
^^^
Line 11, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...issue, instead of buying stuff that you dont need you can travel and see diffrenet c...
^^^^
Line 19, column 35, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Above all, money are a luxury and no many people know how to juggle with the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, talking about, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77165354331 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48770718615 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6547607365 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24320183896 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839549548279 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101594925736 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123438386661 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810805604886 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.