Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individual and society. To what extend do you agree?
Digital networking platforms are thought to have deep bad influence on people and society by many. This essay largely agrees to the statement because such platforms can alienate a person and also can spread fake news like wildfire which can result in devastated situations.
The aim of any networking website is to connect people virtually; however this can lead to a person being isolated from rest of the surroundings. This has become a trend everywhere from family to public places. One of the age groups majorly affected are adolescents who are always engrossed in their phones. At large, it does not appear to be a serious issue but it is as nobody can know what information a person is checking or to whom is he talking. It has become difficult for parents to determine about online activities and this can have unpreventable consequences. A recent study of effects of social media done on age group of 13-50 demonstrated that almost all subjects have started spending more time alone after signing up on different websites, and this was seen largest in age group of 15-19. Also, another different study done by Beijing University has found direct link between usage of social media and rise in suicide among people. So a person just does not stop socializing but also can be in wrong place among wrong company because of networking sites.
Also, these virtual public networks can sway the public opinion at large and the repercussions may commence a rift between people. Because of the ease of usability and availability of these platforms, certain unsocial elements take advantage of them and post fake details on social media. There is generally no moderation on information and many can believe it without checking the authenticity. For an instance, there were deaths in some states of India due to fake messages of some people being child abductors. The messages were rounded in message sharing application What’s app and innocent persons were lynched being mistaken for kidnappers. After this, What’s app had to limit the number of forwarded messages by a user.
To conclude, online communication sites can leave a bad influence on a person as well as society. This can result into people being emotionally disconnected from their family, friends and take steps which can overwhelm the life of others. In addition to affecting people individually, networking sites can be a platform to pass wrong information having serious ramifications like deaths of many.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | Neelam Macwan | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest time of most people’s lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibility.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Parents of obese children should be punished for making their children fat. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Happiness if often considered difficult to define Why is this What factors determine happiness 74
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own kno 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79959473505 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561274509804 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5085653821 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.578947368 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138242481812 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448235873363 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314023328476 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903823400671 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112906438507 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.