Many people believe that sportspeople who break the rules should be forbidden to compete again.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
Write at least 250 words.
It is a highly debatable issue that whether the sportsperson who does not obey the rules should be given an opportunity to play again or not. Some individuals opine that they do not deserve to get a second chance while others hold the opposite view of it. From my perspective, they should not be allowed to participate.
To begin with, sports have become an integral part of one's life. Playing sports does not involve only physical fitness rather it brings a plethora of traits such as leadership, co-operation, co-ordination, loyalty etcetera. In spite of this, breaking rules of sports can be either physically hurting other sports player or violating the game rules. For instance, in order to win, any player may try to physically hit the opponent so that he could not play well and loose the game. However, there should be a punishment for the same and in my view there cannot be a bigger punishment than throwing the culprit out of the game. It is significant to learn that winning only is not important rather the crucial thing is how we are winning.
Moreover, once an individual starts violating the rules, it becomes a habit which naturally start occuring whenever he will play. Therefore, it does not promote the good side of a sportsperson. What is more, it also put bad influence on other players which may also develop this habit without knowing their repercussions. Besides, due to the wrong doings of one person, the whole team have to suffer which is not appropriate. Accordingly, it is quite a right decision to disqualify the accused.
To recapitulate, it is prominent to teach a lesson to one who does not follow the rules. Sports should be played with proper dedication not with intention of winning by hook or crook. It is the responsibility of parents and teachers to show them the right path so they can escape from facing this kind of situation.
- Nowadays many young adults find the consumption of energy drinks as a reliable way to recover from exhaustion and stress Is this a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- Many people believe that sportspeople who break the rules should be forbidden to compete again To what extend do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 83
- Nowadays many young adults find the consumption of energy drinks as a reliable way to recover from exhaustion and stress Is this a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- Some people believe that traditional music album and single consumption is vital for the music industry On the other hand others think that digital streaming and downloading play bigger roles Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your 67
- Many people prefer to read the news on a screen smartphones tablets laptops fact that has relegated newspapers to a second option For this reason there is the common belief newspapers will disappear sooner than later Do you think this will end up happenin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... sports have become an integral part of ones life. Playing sports does not involve o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... can be either physically hurting other sports player or violating the game rules. For...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, kind of, such as, in my view, in spite of, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81172839506 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76703512567 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.923894238 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3529411765 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105989521996 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324219429171 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348886531262 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666069609726 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371263609502 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.