In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
In today’s world, there is a growing concern with regards to the rapid growth of population in urban areas and the shortage of available spaces for building new homes for them. Considering some probable drawbacks, a wide range of individuals in whole societies state that it is vital to preserve countryside areas and avoid constructing new building blocks there to provide accommodations required in big cities. I subscribe to the idea that not only this approach is undeniable, but also it would be beneficial by means of strict regulations.
The people who are opposed to building homes in rural areas state that this process would deteriorate the environment. They hold this view that construction in countrysides would eventually result in deforestation or demolishing farmlands. Although this commonly held belief might be valid in some cases, overcrowded cities filled with buildings and lack of accommodations might bring about considerable threats as well.
First and foremost, the exponential growth of population is an unavoidable fact of the modern world. Industrialization and technological advancements have made dramatic changes in urbanization. It attracts more people towards living in big cities. As more a country developed, more workforce was required in its capitals and other major cities. Therefore, the urban areas of these cities have become saturated with people and buildings needed for their accommodation. Accordingly, the governments nowadays have simply no other option but to utilize the rural areas in order to create homes for their community.
More importantly, dividing business parts of a city from its residential areas have noticeable benefits as well. This approach can reduce the overcrowdedness of urban areas and decline the traffic jams which are mainly caused by daily commutes. In doing so, the air quality of city areas will ameliorate to the great extent which is a tremendous environmental achievement.
Taken together, I firmly hold the view that using suburbs for generating new homes is imperative for modern societies and would improve the quality of life by reducing the excessive population living in a city and also would decrease the air pollution. However, in order to protect the countryside’s environment, strict regulations and close surveillance should be imposed on construction activities in these areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | mohammadras | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | sohailahmad | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with this statement? sometimes people think nowadays the media are less concern about the accuracy of news than in the past 76
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now. 79
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion about this? 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51639344262 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22111217096 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560109289617 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2923627373 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.764705882 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253573305732 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721829131708 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643528929815 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137341198821 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784667017908 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.