In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion?

With the increasing population, the problem of living space is also increasing rapidly. Nowadays, more living space and homes are needed, however, the unavailability of vacant land inside the cities is leading builders to move to the countryside. While it is crucial to develop more colonies for the growing number of humans, destroying habitat which is equally significant to other species cannot be justified. Is it important to build new homes by tearing down the countryside instead of trying to control the population?

Firstly, it cannot be denied that need for more housing facilities is required urgently. However, rural areas that are habitat to a huge number of animals are equally important. The Earth’s population has increased a lot in recent years and it has become a threat to other living species. Hence, rather than developing new living space areas, builders and governments should plan to build more multi-story buildings and should prevent anyone to move to the countryside.

Lastly, rural areas not only play a vital role as a natural habitat but also generate a significant amount of Oxygen which is extremely vital for everyone. Therefore the wilds should be declared as protected by the government and no construction of any kind should be allowed unless it is beneficial for the countryside.

In essence, even though the requirements of new housing facilities are increasing and should also be attended to but not with the cost of destroying natural rural areas which are home to many animals. Instead, they should come up with the schemes to construct buildings within the available area as the animals also have an equal right on the planet Earth and to live their lives peacefully.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... which is extremely vital for everyone. Therefore the wilds should be declared as protect...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16428571429 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82738070175 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8441407933 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230418278542 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843973593196 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798978058831 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142614409958 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633997751976 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.