Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?

With the advent of new technology, lifestyle of people have been changed. Owing to this, various household chores are replaced by machines instead of humans. I think this development has more benefits than drawbacks which I will elucidate in following paragraphs.

On the one hand, numerous house-hold work had been done by men and women in previous time. As advance innovative gizmo are doing these work, people get plenty of time to spend with their kith and kin. Consequently, it assists to build healthy kinship between family members when quality time is spent by them together. For example, in the past, it would take 4 to 5 hours to complete home tasks, whereas this times is reduced up to 1 to 2 hours because of different appliances such as., washing machine and dishwasher. In addition to that, people cannot only spend good times with family, but they can also utilize it for the betterment of their future. However, there are several disadvantages of this alteration that cannot be ignored.

On the other hand, the biggest con of this evolution is that over-reliance on technical devices can cause detrimental implications on human health. This is because amount of physical exercise is alleviated due to latest gadgets do work instead of people. As a result, people become obese and lazy as all the arduous work is accomplished by man-made machines. To exemplify, people used to clean their clothes by hands only in the past which was very good source of work-out, but these work is replace by machines and ultimately, it has made them unfit. Moreover, electronics appliances run on electricity and producing electricity is one of the significant pollutants. Therefore, it is essential to curtail its utilization.

To recapitulate, though people have more time for their relatives because house-work is completed by machines, I bolster the notion that high dependency on machines hamper overall physical fitness. Furthermore, it is recommended that instead of completing all the works by machines, people should do certain things on their own as well.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-21 JPS 56 view
2019-11-21 JPS 56 view
2019-09-06 daly.shaker.99@gmail.com 84 view
2019-08-12 sbsomaya 67 view
2019-08-12 sbsomaya 67 view
Essays by user ratnumohit :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...5 hours to complete home tasks, whereas this times is reduced up to 1 to 2 hours bec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
... of physical exercise is alleviated due to latest gadgets do work instead of people. As a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...d source of work-out, but these work is replace by machines and ultimately, it has made...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13609467456 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87129224854 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60650887574 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7763861049 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.117647059 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143053211591 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433595262962 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472282007949 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800729586819 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140309421236 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.