Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival period, people now a days only want to enjoy themselves.
To what extend u agree or disagree
In the modern society, the concept of celebrating commemorations related to its traditions as well as religion has long lost. While the materialist, contemporary youth may want to live an isolated life, I strongly believe that the festive celebrations not only keep us connected to our neighbourhood but is a source to trigger the inspiration from surroundings. This essay will discuss both sides of an argument before reaching a rational conclusion.
On the one hand, for the critics of the community gatherings, perhaps, the principal argument is that the fast paced, technologically sophisticated current era has no time to waste, in meeting and greeting the bunch of unknown people. Therefore, they think that time can only be best spent by sitting on a couch, doing something a person loves to do rather than socialising with others having no mental compatibility. For instance, The National Statistical Data Department of Pakistan issued the annual report on the popularity of Eid festival in a province of Punjab, and unfortunate as it may seem that statistics reflect that the popularity graph of Eid has hit the new low of 36 %, in last five years.
On the other hand, in my view, the public gatherings, especially in the form of festivals, are the eminent source of communal networking and knowledge sharing. When the people from various backgrounds and diverse interests, come to the single platform and get engaged in a casual conversation, they not only develop the mutual bonding but also exchange the different perspectives about the common problems. The multiple-perspective approach is a highly desirable phenomenon in technological innovation. Take Google as an example, the informal meetings or can be best described as parties are conducted periodically to encourage the developing a connection between employees and to igniting the ideas sharing marathon among the personnel of entirely different departments.
In conclusion, although people take social meetings merely as time wasting activities, I completely agree with the notion that communicating with others in an informal way has only positive impacts including making new acquaintances and knowledge transfer among various experts.
- More information available online so library books are useless Agree or disagree with statement 86
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have a baby leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for upbringing. To what extend you agree and disagree with t 61
- Economic progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, somepeople believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should alsobe considered when measuring a country's success? Do you think one factor ismore important tha 78
- Economic progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, somepeople believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should alsobe considered when measuring a country's success? Do you think one factor ismore important tha 44
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics Pros Cons 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an informal way" with adverb for "informal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e notion that communicating with others in an informal way has only positive impacts including mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41449275362 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24867319226 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634782608696 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0468556287 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.818181818 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3636363636 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103060545231 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302929848213 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028993935076 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575324542007 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137458812415 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.