Nowadays, in the society consumer goods are cheaper to buy. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?
In recent years, the consumption power of modern society is increasing thanks to the ability to produce goods more effectively and less expensive compared to ten years ago. With this trend, people’s life is becoming more affordable and has a better standard. However, with any advantage, there is a disadvantage that needed to be considered.
Thanks to the advancement of technology and machinery, consumer goods are cheaper and faster to produce in bulk. Thus, people’s buying power is at the highest point in history which leads to a better life. For example, many years ago, smartphones are considered by many to be a luxury item that only the richest could afford. Today, almost everybody has one. This small technology wonder enables people to do many things, whether it is web surfing, games playing, music listening, people communicating, all is in one’s palm. There is no doubt that modern people’s standard of living is increasing in every aspect.
Moreover, better consuming power means more competition for manufacturers. Due to high demand and high competitive market, many manufacturers have to put more money and effort into technology development in order to create more goods to satisfy its consumer. This phenomenon helps humanity advances in technology and create a much better future. For instance, advances in technology enable Tesla, an automobile manufacturer, to create the world's first electric car that is both eco-friendly and smart enough to self-drive.
But as the old saying, any advantage comes with a disadvantage. Producing too many goods could lead to environmental damage that cannot be undone. To satisfy the increasing consumer’s requirement, more factories have to be built, more forests have to be cut, more fossil fuel has to be consumed, and those activities, of course, are harmful to our mother earth. Fortunately, environmental reservation is becoming a hot topic for both consumer and provider.
To conclude, consumer goods which are more widely available is absolutely a good phenomenon, for both people’s life and technology advancement. Meanwhile, we should not neglect the effect it could cause on our earth. To fix this, environmental awareness-raising for everybody is the way forward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Nancysachdeva | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | oywaxon | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | oywaxon | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | faithywealth | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-30 | shain | 73 | view |
- You are a commuter One morning on your way to work you suddenly fell ill and lost your consciousness One gentleman on the same bus sent you to a hospital Write a letter to the company where the gentlemen work to extend your gratefulness 87
- Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects to make progress Do you agree or disagree 87
- A work colleague or student friend has applied for a new job and he she has asked you to write a reference letter to the new employer Write a letter to the employer to recommend your colleague friend In your letter State your reason for writing and say ho 89
- Health experts believe that walking is a good exercise for health However people are walking less nowadays Why is this happening Solutions 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...advantage that needed to be considered. Thanks to the advancement of technology ...
^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ising for everybody is the way forward.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, no doubt, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38526912181 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09940389761 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56940509915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4010548406 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.05 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140756119082 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405826535822 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464679213113 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760446584578 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210527588159 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.