Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Population explosion has escalated the issue of waste management. Nowadays amount of waste produced is increasing exponentially. In this contemplation I will discuss various reasons responsible for the increased waste production and what steps the government should take for eliminating waste production.
Overpopulation is the prime cause of excessive rubbish production. Since more customers buy products from supermarkets mostly packed in plastic bags or containers so more waste is produced. Therefore, plastic packaging leads to the accumulation of non-biodegradable dispose in huge amounts. For instance, according to studies India has insufficient resources to manage the hospital waste.
Another cause is insufficient manpower for managing the waste. Municipal committees do not have enough personnel for handling the waste produced in huge cities. This results in accumulation of rubbish on road side, sewerages, and ponds.
Governments should adopt stringent policies for reducing the amount of waste produced. Laws should be made that would restrict the factories to limit the use of plastic for packaging the products. Another step that needs to be taken is to increase the manpower for managing the waste. Government should employee more employees for municipal corporations who are responsible for managing the city waste. Moreover, waste management training should be made mandatory for all government and private employees. For example, employees can be taught about disposing the trash in color coded dustbin and paper recycling. This will reduce the unsorted waste that has to be incinerated or buried.
In conclusion, I would reiterate the important part government intervention can plays for reducing the amount of trash produced. Reducing plastic packaging and training employees to reduce waste and recycling methods can help for reducing the trash production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why you cannot continue at this time say what action 73
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that job provides both income and a social life while others think that friends should be made outside of work Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
...ortant part government intervention can plays for reducing the amount of trash produc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79496402878 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08562023311 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2710466301 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7894736842 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6315789474 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184991234182 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627060351229 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545843374654 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113361975341 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281669472712 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.71 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.