Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Population explosion has escalated the issue of waste management. Nowadays amount of waste produced is increasing exponentially. In this contemplation I will discuss various reasons responsible for the increased waste production and what steps the government should take for eliminating waste production.
Overpopulation is the prime cause of excessive rubbish production. Since more customers buy products from supermarkets mostly packed in plastic bags or containers so more waste is produced. Therefore, plastic packaging leads to the accumulation of non-biodegradable dispose in huge amounts. For instance, according to studies India has insufficient resources to manage the hospital waste.
Another cause is insufficient manpower for managing the waste. Municipal committees do not have enough personnel for handling the waste produced in huge cities. This results in accumulation of rubbish on road side, sewerages, and ponds.
Governments should adopt stringent policies for reducing the amount of waste produced. Laws should be made that would restrict the factories to limit the use of plastic for packaging the products. Another step that needs to be taken is to increase the manpower for managing the waste. Government should employee more employees for municipal corporations who are responsible for managing the city waste. Moreover, waste management training should be made mandatory for all government and private employees. For example, employees can be taught about disposing the trash in color coded dustbin and paper recycling. This will reduce the unsorted waste that has to be incinerated or buried.
In conclusion, I would reiterate the important part government intervention can plays for reducing the amount of trash produced. Reducing plastic packaging and training employees to reduce waste and recycling methods can help for reducing the trash production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- It was predicted that people in the 21st century would have much more free time than in the past To what extent has this prediction come true 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 56
- There are many female students who finish degrees in science and technology courses at university but few move into the workplace after they graduate Why is this What measures can be taken to encourage them into work 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
...ortant part government intervention can plays for reducing the amount of trash produc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79496402878 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08562023311 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528776978417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2710466301 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7894736842 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6315789474 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184991234182 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627060351229 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545843374654 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113361975341 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281669472712 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.71 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.