Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In the midst of globalisation and industrialisation, the amount of waste being exhaled, detrimental to our planet earth, is appalling. Reasons are aplenty, as to why this is a frequent occurrence and the imperative role of government worldwide over in countering this, is a moot one. Let us discourse on the same below.
There are many reasons behind the increase in the production of rubbish throughout the world. Firstly, the ever increase of population of the humankind has contributed to a mammoth share of the trash. The number of people has always been directly proportional to the volume of waste being produced from the time immemorial. Secondly, the industrial revolution, that shook the world a decade ago, is considered sole culprit in the production of industrious waste onto earth’s surface. Again the number of industries and factories contributing to this menace are on a steep climb, since its inception.
Thirdly, the population rise has led to more transport system around the world, owing to increase in the waste produced from the vehicles and other means of transport. To cite an example from the part of the world I live, the discarded parts of cars, such as a blotted tire, is ubiquitous, compared to the past. Finally, the sheer negligence from us, with regards to recycling of waste products has led to adding more chaos to the present scenario. No care, what so ever, was taken in the production of biodegradable products, so as to mitigate the amount of trash produced!
The role of government in combating the issue is inevitable. They should be imposing restrictions on the above-discoursed factors, favouring waste segregation. Population check, of governments on their respective states, should be made mandatory. The industries and factories should be restricted and monitored for the effective recycling or biodegradation of their waste produced. The amenities used by mankind, such as transport should be made more efficient and effective in terms of discarded residual waste. Building eco-friendly homes should be encouraged. More emphasis should be made on the recycling of all the industrial trash being produced o an emergency basis. The government should focus more on the fact that, these are either biodegradable or can be recycled effectively.
From the above discourse, someone's role as civilians of earth and that of government is quite interdependent and significant, when comes to reducing the amount of waste being produced. Punitive measures from the government are the needs of the hour, to tackle this issue, so as to ensure rather envisage, a cleaner and habitable planet earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Ahmedmamdouhamin | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | noen | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | seby0406 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | Vaman Randhawa | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 61 | view |
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration for many. Others, however, prefer different other aspects of a job over the salary they earn. 67
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What do you think are the reasons for this? Do advantages of this trend outweigh disadvantages? 78
- The only way to cut the crime rate is building more prisons and make prison sentences longer. 78
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that top level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to take any decision while other disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e production of biodegradable products, so as to mitigate the amount of trash produced! ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of discarded residual waste. Building eco-friendly homes should be encouraged....
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eeds of the hour, to tackle this issue, so as to ensure rather envisage, a cleaner and h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24349881797 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11503377845 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522458628842 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1881011018 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.619047619 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16027660255 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457876824548 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410085033343 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847877034003 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172464263667 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.