People behavior and ways of life vary (greetings, table manner and clothing) from country to country. It is sometimes said that when people are visiting another country, for example on business or for a holiday, they should behave in the same way as the inhabitants of that country. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, the travel industry has contributed to global connectivity. Further, travel on business or for a holiday is a necessity for most professionals working in international firms. This essay completely agrees with the statement that people should behave and change the way of greeting locals or table mannerism when in other country. The changes in behavior during a visit can both be satisfying and bonding experience for everybody.
Firstly, adopting and adapting to the new cultural requirement can be rewarding. It is a wonderful opportunity to try and understand the cultural differences and appreciate the fashion sense or manners of people in other country. For example, when an American visits India and tries to eat local dishes such as “Idly” with their hand, the experience may be satisfying. Hence, it is beneficial to be a roman in Rome.
Secondly, it is important to connect with other nationals for understanding of their culture. Learning by experience is the key to taking home elements of the place. If a Canadian learn to use “Namaste” or “Jai Sri Krishna” from in travel to India for instance instead of using “Hi” or “Hello” to greet, it can be wonderful way to connect with the Indian community when you are back from vacation to Canada. This can cultivate empathy towards other nationals.
To conclude, people change the way of life when in other country and should do it when they visit on business or on holiday. In my opinion, I completely agree with it as there is no harm to change your greeting words or way of eating for complete understanding of local way of life in another country.
- Many people try to look younger than they really are For what reasons do you think people try to look younger than they are Is it a good thing or a bad thing 73
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The table and chart give information on pilots in 3 years Summarize information report main feature and compare relevant information 73
- Last weekend you stayed with a friend You think that perhaps you left your watch in his house Write a letter to this friend In your letter Thank him her Explain about your watch Say what you want him to do 73
- The table and chart give information on pilots in 3 years Summarize information report main feature and compare relevant information 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ges in behavior during a visit can both be satisfying and bonding experience for everybody. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...rding. It is a wonderful opportunity to try and understand the cultural differences and...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ly” with their hand, the experience may be satisfying. Hence, it is beneficial to be a roman ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99270072993 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94204050329 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547445255474 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0200334572 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7142857143 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326017194276 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986241492173 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114205427398 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207613486538 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124265723675 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.