The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent
and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their
education. Given time, technology will replace the traditional teacher in the
classroom. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, technology has been increasingly used throughout the world and it has dominated almost all aspects of human lives in different ways. This is very apparent in classroom, too. It is disagreed that technology will replace the traditional teacher in the classroom. This will be proven by analyzing how teachers can cater to the needs of their students as well as motivate and discipline them.
A very important aspect of teaching is the ability of the teacher to shape his teaching style to the needs of students. As an example, if students in any given class are having trouble understanding a classroom topic, the teacher can rephrase the topic and deliver it in a more effective way. A computerized teacher would be less in-tune with what students require and thus would be incapable of doing this. Thus, technology will not take the place of teachers in classroom.
Motivation and discipline are key to a student`s academic success in the classroom. This is very apparent when teaching children as children require more motivation and discipline to be taught effectively. A technology based teacher simply cannot accomplish this as certain situations require judgment as to whether a student is acting in an appropriate manner or not. After analyzing this, it is clear that teachers will always be needed in the classroom.
Following the analyzation of the teachers` ability to cater to students as well as their capability of guiding students toward success, it is clear that technology will never replace teachers in the classroom. It is expected that technology will act as a supplement to teachers and aid them in instructing their pupils.
- A magazine published an article about your country. However there are some mistakes/wrong information in that article. Write a letter to the editor:- Explain that the article contains wrong information.- Supply the correct information instead.- Provide so 80
- You borrowed a tour guide book from your friend which was very useful. Write a letter and say- Why was it helpful for you?- When will you return this book?- Thank him/her for this guide book. 83
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think that in modern world we are more dependent on each other ,while other think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views. 24
- You rented a car recently, but were not satisfied with it.Write a letter of complaint to the rental agency. In your letter Introduce yourself Explain what went wrong with the car you rented Ask for some form of compensation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... as certain situations require judgment as to whether a student is acting in an appropriate m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...gment as to whether a student is acting in an appropriate manner or not. After analyzing this, it is cle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, thus, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21771217712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99721870138 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50184501845 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5096165772 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284721834539 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11734094928 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841453133369 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194416204747 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358847277355 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.