The qualities and skills that a person requires to become successful in today's world cannot be learned at a university or other academic institutions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some say success is relative to the qualities and skills that one can offer. It is believed that people won’t be able to acquire them in educational centers or universities. From my vantage point, I partially agree and believe that recreational centers can play a vital role in gaining useful abilities to success as well as other factors other than education.
To begin with, universities or academic institutions can be seen as the main structure of what success in life can be. To be more specific, someone who wants to become a pilot should undergo many years of study to achieve a certain level of knowledge to finally be able to sit in a real plane and gain physical experience. Therefore, educational facilities and universities are the place that people gain the essential knowledge of a profession and then during their career could mold it into something great that potentially brings them success.
On the other hand, sometimes there are qualities and skills, which count as an innate talent that a university cannot teach. To put in other words, some people have a natural talent that they can use to become a well-known person. Sports or even the entertainment industry can be some examples. There are even people who learn their talent without going to college and became very successful in life. Therefore, it is safe to say that there are people who don’t attend college or university and became successful in life.
In conclusion, it is indeed true that universities are the right trajectory to success. However, we should not disregard the idea that education cannot be the only way to have a better life or be a financially stable citizen. The natural talent and hard work of sportsmen contributes to their success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | bgoswamii | 95 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | saipriyanka | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | Farhad1010 | 86 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Monika Goswami | 68 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 78
- The qualities and skills that a person requires to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 73
- Government should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports Do you agree or disagree with this statement 88
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 311, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...ry can be some examples. There are even people who learn their talent without going to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01016949153 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80369108705 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545762711864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.504772632 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224580696393 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777212415125 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372588715852 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133700651351 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012809714435 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.