In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing.
What kinds of changes can occur?
Do you think these changes are positive and negative
In recent times, the dynamics of family have been changing in every part of the world. The patriarchy is slowly shifting it’s course as both the partners are considered equal. Despite the drastic change, I think this is definetly a positive sign in the society.
To commence, earlier in the patriarchal society, father/husband made decisions in the family as he was the breadwinner. In contrast to this, today both the partners are working to meet the financial demands. As a result, decisions are made together. In addition to this, couples in this generation prefer to stay away from their families due to their careers. Unlike the family-owned businesses earlier, most of the individuals have different careers, in contrast to their parents. Thus, with the current demands and requirements in society, it is obvious that changes occur in the family dynamics.
However, the drastic shift of family situations can be considered positive for various reasons. Firstly, the burden of running a family with a single income is now shared by both the partners. This relaxed men, as in this generation they are seen less aggressive. Secondly, many youngsters previously relied on family businesses as they did not have much of an option, but where as now, peole are not judged based on their career choices any more. Thirdly, large joint families needs lot of nurturing as even a slightest disagreement can break the family. Therefore, today’s generation prefers nuclear families. Thus, the potives of today’s family situations definetly overweigh the negatives.
To conclude, although it is rare to witness close-knitted families, I believe the shift in family dynamics should be seen as a positive sign.
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letterdescribe the item you lostexplain how you lost ittell the insura 61
- Many countries aim to improve their living standards by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result.Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many people associate money with happiness and think that more money one has,the happier they should be.do you agree or disagree? 61
- Q .Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. Why is this ? is it a positive or negative development ? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is now shared by both the partners. This relaxed men, as in this generation they ...
^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...hey did not have much of an option, but where as now, peole are not judged based on thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 511, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...families needs lot of nurturing as even a slightest disagreement can break the fa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, i think, in addition, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32846715328 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9080332278 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2062011405 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8823529412 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142935960045 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045641442582 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476314263938 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904869827531 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296702548891 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.