Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes- the government or the people who build the home?

Essay topics:

Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes- the government or the people who build the home?

Home is the symbol of secure and safe place for any human being. It is critical that a house is built with safety standards. This essay will explain that how the government should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes. Firstly, this essay will mention the roles of government and builders. Secondly, it will explain why and how the government should be responsible.

People spend a huge part of their savings to buy a home, it is obviously expected to be safe and secured. On the first hand, government decides the amount of land to be used for building whereas on other hand, builder or contractor builds house as per the plan which is usually proposed by an architect. The plan decides the structure of the house.

As a builder or a contractor works for profit of an individual or an organisation they work for, so government should intervene in the planning which will make sure that a builder does not compromise with any safety standards for sake of money. For instance, government should clearly describe the rules and regulation to be followed by a builder. It should contain details like: how much open space should be there, how the fire exits should be planned and what should be the contingency plan. If every code is strictly followed, then there will be minimal probability of contrary conditions.

To sum up the idea, government working with collaboration with builder will ensure the comfort that people expects from home. In the future, cities will be more planned with this kind of initiatives and will give people the satisfaction of both home and electing the government.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-30 Satrajit 56 view
2018-08-30 Satrajit 56 view
2018-08-30 Satrajit 56 view
Essays by user Satrajit :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for instance, kind of, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90842490842 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67944649305 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9836048429 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304366519952 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104627235701 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744768658935 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183485752908 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442711664417 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.