Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, we are living in the world where international language is a heated topic and often discussed. It is commonly argued by some scientists that there will be a predominant dialect which will be used by people in all around the world. While the use of one same language are considered to be advantageous, they could have numerous detrimental influences.
On the one hand, a worldwide language usage has multiple positive sides. First and foremost, with the same dialect utilization, humanity could lift up the language barrier which was estimated the most difficult challenge in global business together with international education during human developmental history. A good example could be students from emergent countries who have to pay a fortune for learning English ability to embark on oversea study in developmentally educational nations such as the United Kingdom, the United State America, where their first and priority language is English, with the hope to gain more knowledge. Using the same dialect will ease this difficulty and assist learner to make the most of opportunities to achieve their dream without spending lots of time and money on learning a new and strange language.
On the other hand, this trend could also bring some demerits. A language represents people's way of thinking and way of life as well as culture of the region where the language is spoken. That why a disappearance of minor language causes the loss of customs, festivals and social norm which lead to the demolition of cultural diversity that creates the richness in human life. Latin language actually seem to support this situation.
In conclusion, using a same language would bring both positive and negative impact on humanity life. In my personal perpective, we should develop a worldwide language and also preserve the unique dialects of each nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | Nora01 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Anh Khoa Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | quytnee | 93 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Minyuu_Ivy | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | Jeetrandhawa | 84 | view |
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 78
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private healthcare outweigh the disadvantages 80
- The maps below show the organization of a book store in 2000 and now 67
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through Internet and they can study as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the opportunities') or simply say ''most opportunities''.
Suggestion: most of the opportunities; most opportunities
...fficulty and assist learner to make the most of opportunities to achieve their dream without spending...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17763157895 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82505086611 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6714279076 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257884824266 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918716647408 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473506694116 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157186623093 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314012117043 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.