Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults Why this Do you think this is a positive or negative development

In recent times, when technological advancements have provided us with a lot of spare time. Shopping has emerged as the predominant way to spend free time among youngsters in many countries around the world. In my opinion, this is a negative development owing to the detrimental effects on their career and economic conditions.

To begin with, spending most of the valuable time shopping distract youngsters from their career development. This is simply because they enjoy buying new products for gaining praise among friends. When they tend to focus more on purchasing new items, for instance, most of their daytime is spent in search of the perfect article either online or offline. As a result of these distractions, the attention and priority to career goals decrease. As a young adult, more time should be spent on personal career growth and learning.

Furthermore, purchasing excessively can deteriorate the economic condition of young adults. In order to appear rich and fashionable, they begin to spend a large chunk of their income on shopping for new trendy products which usually leaves them with little or no money to spend on essential utilities. For instance, many youngsters use credit cards heavily on shopping without realizing their payback potential and eventually end up with large credit loans. This affects their economic condition and sometimes mental health as well.

In conclusion, I believe spending time and money shopping as a leisure activity affects young adults in their career path as well as economically. The focus should be given to more productive hobbies and investing in their career.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29069767442 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79507892517 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8956111239 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178540412351 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620379936434 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448115287632 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113005073565 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129289219885 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.