Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is irrefutable in this modern era technology has invade peoples lives both positive and negative manner. Some argue that it has led people to become anti-social while others disagree. This essay is an attempt to discuss both views and evaluate accordingly.
To begin with, since the revolutionary invention of Internet, regardless to the age category everyone is obsessed with technology. People fall in love with technological gadgets and carry it wherever they go specially smartphones, tablets, portable music players and mini laptops in order to be in touch with their social networks, favourite musics and movies and their office work. People occupy their commuting time to use these mobile technological devices and because of this development people tend to be less social in their day to day life. They completely ignore the real world and person next them they mind their own business.
However, on the other hand this modern technology is a one mean of a socialising for new generation. They use social network to communicate with their peers, siblings and relatives and also in terms of business and official work. As examples young generation use facebook or twitter to contact their friends and professionals use Skype for business and Cisco Webex in their official work to socialise with the other co-workers or business partners.
In my opinion, I strongly believe that modern technology has positively influence people's social skills which as a new method to socialise. People find it as very convenient method due its liveliness and mobility, not like before where they have to wait for ages to get a reply to a mail they sent. They can have instant reply to their messages and make a video call to someone in distance.
In conclusion, modern technology has its own merits and demerits. However when considering the all the fact above it is evident that technology have help people to stay more connected than ever and have helped them to be more social.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | learnafren | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Akilan | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Moid | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | vinshu koul | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | JOHN JEYARAJ | 67 | view |
- Some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historic buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it As a citizen you don t want it to happen Write a letter to the city council and say What is the importance of the building Why s 93
- Some people argue that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures. Others argue that these sports can cause problems and increase conflict between nations. Discuss both pints and give your opinion. 84
- In cities many people are living alone. What are the reasons for it? It is a positive or negative trend? 84
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'invaded'.
Suggestion: invaded
...table in this modern era technology has invade peoples lives both positive and negativ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'influenced'.
Suggestion: influenced
...e that modern technology has positively influence peoples social skills which as a new me...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nology has its own merits and demerits. However when considering the all the fact above...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07645259939 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72644333382 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587155963303 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1431363332 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259016543091 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946933165849 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081604531773 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1498407754 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943112445949 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.