In some countries around the world men and women are having children at a later age than in the past. What are the reasons for this development? What are the effects on society and family life?
Modern era has witnessed the change in trend of family planning in many areas. Nowadays, couples are planning families at older ages, and there are numerous reasons of this change like work-life goals force them to delay for family and for some for protection of freedom to longer run inculcates towards this decision. This trend is affecting both social and personal life of a person which will be discussed in the forth coming paragraph.
To begin with, gone are the days when women were only confide to the walls of house, now both are working hand in hand to survive in this competitive world. Therefore in the race of work-life balance, work is always at priority and force couples to plan for new member at later age as this not only distract them from work but also have adverse effect on career progression. Another aspect is, a baby always come with bundle of responsibilities and many pairs do not want to get involved in this at tender age of their married life and eventually postponing the decision for elder ages.
All these situations explained above are putting negative effect on society and family too. It is evident that grown up parents do not have much energy to catch up with the children and this will indirectly put ill-effect on a child’s overall growth. Society is also get effected by the age gap between the generations as mother nature has set cycle for each generation and via planning children at old age one can disturbing the cycle of birth. For instance, a survey has shown that elder parents will not able to survive till child reach marriage age.
To conclude, there is no shadow of doubt that busy work schedule and fear of responsibilities force married ones to postpone the decision of having children. It is not only developing generation gap but also hindering cognitive development of child.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-19 | Palki Sharma | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-19 | Palki Sharma | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | ritud007 | 73 | view |
- You are organising a local committee meeting You would like a local MP to attend the meeting to contribute to a discussion about green areas in the community Write a letter of invitation to the MP s secretary Mrs Shelton In your letter introduce your comm 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat Write a letter to your neighbours In your letter explain the reasons for the noise apologise describe what action 73
- Nowadays people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individual and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Living standards of urban areas are higher than rural areas Give reasons why so and proposal for the solution 84
- Modern technology has increased material wealth but not our happiness To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d to survive in this competitive world. Therefore in the race of work-life balance, work ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80126182965 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56768382572 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580441640379 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5279687405 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301823635441 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973487412338 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528960135303 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16437635052 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457777960864 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.