In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
It is true that overconsumption of fast food has led to the aggravation in the rate at which residents of some nations suffer from medical ailments. While exacting more tariff on fast food seem to combat some health challenges as people becomes more conscious of their eating habit and reduce fast food intake, I am of the opinion that this action will ultimately increase the level of hardship and even escalate some other health issues.
It is possible for the government to achieve part of its objectives in the short run by increasing the levy charged on fast food for two reasons. Firstly, a higher tax on fast food may discourage some people from purchasing such food always. They will consider going for alternative meals such as home-made food more often. Thus, the rate of illness such as diabetics, obesity and high blood pressure might reduce. In addition, since people will become more conscious of their purse because of the increased tax, there will be an increased consciousness in developing a better eating habit. This will make the residents more responsible for their health and take in foods that are more beneficial. They will give more priority to eating more balanced diets which will include non-taxed raw foods like fruits and vegetables.
However, increased levy on fast food will significantly have negative impacts on many people. In the first instance, there will be an increased rate of poverty. Since fast food is a necessity to a lot of people, considering their nature of work and lifestyle, a rise in fast-food tax will automatically lead to higher feeding cost. With this, many people's earnings will be used for eating only. Therefore, the level of hardship on the nationalities will increase drastically. For example, a research showed that introduction of Value Added Tax (VAT) on fast food in a country increased the poverty rate exponentially. Furthermore, the higher tariff will lead to a higher rate of other illness. In other words, as the prices of fast food increases, many people will have to start missing meals and go hungry many times. Consequently, in the long run, there is a very high risk of such dwellers to be diagnosed with sicknesses such as ulcer, low sugar level or malnutrition.
In conclusion, imposing more taxes on fast food seem not to be the best solution to the health issue many societies face. Although this might look like a fairly good idea now, I believe that the end result in making people poorer and even more prone to other diseases will be more catastrophic and should be avoided.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- You have a new job and can no longer attend your regular English class.Write a letter to the English school. In your letter:- describe the situation- explain the problem- say what you would like to happen now that you cannot attend the lesson. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- Being a celebrity - such as a famous film star or sport personality brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...e some people from purchasing such food always. They will consider going for alternat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92378752887 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70227787899 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501154734411 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6692272584 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295359224365 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108485319013 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674247128156 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201971932416 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521130408694 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.