In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Even though agriculture has been experiencing a number of developments lately, a lot of people still lack food. Thus, malnutrition has become the order of the day in several homes in many countries. Food wastages and exorbitant costs are the significant culprits for the food shortages; nevertheless, the solutions are not far-fetched.
Hunger has been a serious issue for many people in different parts of the world for several reasons. The principal one being that food is too expensive and many people cannot afford it due to their meagre income. For instance, research shows that most people in developing countries, which are densely populated, have difficulties in affording quality three square meals daily. Consequently, most families miss one or two meals every day. Furthermore, advances in technology have led to mechanised farming which is characterised by mass production; however, majority of the products get wasted even before getting to the grassroots. Perishable goods such as fruits and vegetables get spoilt in transit many times and seasonal foods are excessively available just a few weeks in a year and become scarce afterwards.
However, these problems can be solved. Firstly, the government can provide more support to the agricultural sector so as to reduce the prices of food. The cost burden on food products can be lessened by exempting these items, such as farm products and meats, from being taxed. The cost of transportation can also be subsidized by the government. Moreover, issues on food wastage can be fixed by developing reliable preservative techniques for perishable goods and improving the methods of conveying all food products. Although more research will be required in developing such methods, the research cost is an investment which will help reduce hunger.
In conclusion, if the government and researchers can intervene, food will be more readily available, affordable and accessible for most people, hunger will thus be alleviated. Apparently, everybody, and even the common man, can find the recent agricultural developments beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | sana_em | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | jobanjeet | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | gayathri subarshan | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | sukhg1997@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or to work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn foreign languages.Discuss both views and give your own opi 78
- Some People believe that it is good to share s much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your 73
- The continued rise in the world s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time What are the causes of this continued rise Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity 61
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...more support to the agricultural sector so as to reduce the prices of food. The cost bu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45846153846 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04374419067 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4320851533 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.352941176 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135906122067 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512761410772 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385778662778 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824673273724 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224464320693 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.