In some cultures old people are valued more while in others youngsters are cconsider more valuable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
As age plays an increasingly more central part of our lives, it has been suggested that there has been more value to the people based on age. It is often argued that elderly people are more important than millennial. However, in my opinion young people should be given more importance, and this essay will analyze both the sides of the spectrum and draw the conclusion.
Even though youngsters has the main role to play in coming future, it would be foolish to not to recognize the importance of past generation people who taught us the basic of culture and share their impeccable knowledge. In most of the countries age plays a significant factor to be considered for leadership qualities, as matured people have more experience than youth. This has been exemplified in inclining number of people who have been designated as higher authorities in many corporate sectors. One reason behind this happening is, they have more hands-on experience on the industry when compared to present generation. Anyway this is one side of the coin.
On the other hand, it is an irrefutable fact that the future of the world is in the hands of iGeneration. As we can see, that the numbers are overwhelming in certain demographic regions they are often called as countries driven by youth. These are considered as the asset of the culture, as they carry the sentiments and knowledge to the next generations. When it comes to decision-making in many areas juveniles can think more maturely than graying generation. This can be seen in many military operations, that numbers of commanders are under 30-35 years, this is because, at this age they can take instant decisions which can mitigate the risk. These are the ultra prominent reasons that are put forward younger than old people.
Despite there are many speculations around the age factor for the consideration of valuable resources. I opine that youngsters should be considered more valued; because, today’s youth are tomorrow’s leaders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-11 | javaduddupudi | 67 | view |
- Nowadays the use of social media such as Facebook, Twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one-on-one conversations in person. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give your opinion and examples from your own 100
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier why is this is this the best solution 88
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views and give you 91
- Many sports players advertised in sports products Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages 72
- International marketing is sometimes seen as invasive and an intrusion into the country in question. Others argue that it is a necessary and economical form of education in addition to spreading ideas, language and culture. Discuss both sides and give you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and knowledge to the next generations. When it comes to decision-making in many are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, however, if, so, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05775075988 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85875916256 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8112854831 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182749344895 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582954687178 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543496458698 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117779302065 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770907714919 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.