Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In a developing country, arts & music are seldom given priority when compared to public services and businesses. Also, a large portion of people finds the Government’s investment in arts & music unworthy and they (prefer to) shift that investment towards direct development. However, vitalizing arts & creativity, in general, can turn out to be a wise decision by a state.
There are two factors to this theory. The first is how music, arts & paintings can put a country on a global list of attention and how it may result in attracting tourists & investors to visit that country. For example, ancient Greece, as we all know Greece has a rich history of heritage & culture. Their monuments, statues and paintings have a worldwide validation and every year thousands of people visit Greece to enjoy its magnificent picturesque and get affected by it. This eventually helps the existing government to generate a hefty amount of revenue from tourism and to utilize that money to improve the current infrastructure, health care and amenities.
The second factor is how creative education can help a business or a public sector to improve its reach. Almost every product based company is dependent on an artist or an entertainer to promote their products in the consumer market as these types of people have a larger impact on the consumer’s mindset. The marketing industry runs on the fuel of creative tag lines, attractive music, interactive imaging and popular artists. Even a public sector awareness campaign requires an artist. For example, The Clean India campaign chose a movie actor Akshay Kumar to endorse their campaign of promoting the use of proper sanitation among rural areas. Thus, making sure that more people watch the advertisement and get influenced by it.
Summarizing, though it is necessary to have creative engineering and improved public sector for the people. It is also important to have an artistic approach towards growth and development of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | geetha balasubramaniam | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | ramyaram | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Jyoti_dhillon | 67 | view |
- The increase in mobile phone use in recent years has transformed the way we live, communicate and do business. Mobile phones can also be the cause of social or medical problems. What forms do these problems take? Do you think the advantages outweigh the d 84
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger.Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society? 89
- Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Since the 18th-century technological advances have replaced people in the workplace. With today’s technology, this process is happening at a greater rate. Technology is increasingly responsible for unemployment.To what extent do you agree or disagree wi 84
- Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative developmen 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23197492163 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93773813085 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617554858934 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5267060407 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116020466703 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362605433301 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334401571161 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634996409542 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389950418013 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.